Hampton & King
  • Home
  • About
    • About Us
    • Meet Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Birth Injury
    • Negligent Security
    • Cerebral Palsy
    • View All+
  • Case Results
  • Testimonials
  • Resources
    • FAQs
    • Blog
    • Videos
  • Serving
    • Houston
    • Albuquerque
    • League City
    • Pasadena
    • Pearland
    • Santa Fe
  • Contact
Call Us 24/7Free Consultation
Phone (713) 658-0231

Houston’s Top Medical Malpractice AttorneysNo Win No Fee Guarantee

Medical Malpractice and Negligence is All We Do.

Request Your Free Consultation
Request Your Free Consultation

Birth injury case focuses on alleged extractor injury


Posted on March 13th, 2015 Birth Injuries

 

With smart phones a part of everyday life, residents of Houston are likely
to see people on their phones just about everywhere. However, using a
phone during one’s job may be contrary to the standards of care for
that profession. Interestingly, a birth injury case in another state is
demonstrating that on-the-job phone usage predates the prevalence of cell phones.

One of the most well-known birth injuries, cerebral palsy may be the result
of a botched delivery process. In a birth injury case currently at trial,
a family claims their teenage son’s cerebral palsy was the outcome
of a rushed decision to use a vacuum extractor during birth. The mother
was in labor in March of 1998, and her physician, who is being sued for
malpractice, believed she was too exhausted to continue pushing her premature
baby out. The doctor decided to use a vacuum extractor device to pull
the baby out.

According to the attorney for the family, the decision to utilize the extractor,
which they claim caused the boy’s condition, was due to the doctor’s
being in a hurry at the time. The physician was on the phone with a BMW
service station prior to the boy’s birth; the family argues the doctor
was more concerned with getting his vehicle fixed than with patiently
waiting for the mother to give birth naturally. Now, the parents are seeking
compensation for damages for their 16-year-old’s permanent disability.

Vacuum extractors are used in about ten percent of deliveries. Their use
may generate controversy, as it is sometimes speculated that doctors use
them to rush a delivery along rather than for legitimate medical reasons.
In any case, it might be possible for a birth injury to result from the
use of such a device. Families whose children may have been hurt by a
vacuum pump may wish to speak with a Texas malpractice attorney for more
information.

 

Free Consultation

Contact Hampton
& King Today

MM slash DD slash YYYY
City of Incident*
State of Incident*
Required Fields *
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Articles

  • Reasons for Baby Not Crying at Birth
  • Internal Bleeding After a C-Section
  • Excessive Drooling in Babies
  • Infant Brain Damage Symptoms
  • What Causes Cerebral Palsy During Pregnancy?

Categories

  • Birth Injuries
  • Brain Injuries
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Medical Negligence
  • News
  • Nursing Negligence
  • Pregancy-Related Injuries
  • Uncategorized
  • Wrongful Death

Archive

  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
Free Consultation
No Win No Fee

Contact Hampton
& King Today

Contact Hampton
& King Today

MM slash DD slash YYYY
City of Incident*
State of Incident*
Required Fields *
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Texas Office
2603 Augusta Dr.,
Suite 1300
Houston, TX 77057
Get Directions

P (713) 658-0231

New Mexico Office
128 Grant Ave.,
Suite 111
Santa Fe, NM 87501
Get Directions

P (505) 405-8382

Connect With Us

© 2025 Hampton & King.
All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy